Human-Computer Interaction 3e Dix, Finlay, Abowd, Beale
In groups or pairs, use the cognitive walkthrough example, and what you know about user psychology (see Chapter 1), to discuss the design of a computer application of your choice (for example, a word processor or a drawing package). (Hint: Focus your discussion on one or two specific tasks within the application.)
This exercise is intended to give you a feel for using the technique of cognitive walkthrough (CW). CW is described in detail in Chapter 9 and the same format can be used here. It is important to focus on a task that is not too trivial, for example creating a style in a word processing package. Also assume a user who is familiar with the notion of styles (and with applications on the same platform (e.g. Macs, PCs, UNIX, etc.)) but not with the particular word processing package. Attention should be given to instances where the interface fails to support the user in resolving the goal and where it presents false avenues.
What are the benefits and problems of using video in experimentation? If you have access to a video recorder, attempt to transcribe a piece of action and conversation (it does not have to be an experiment - a soap opera will do!). What problems did you encounter?
The benefits of video include: accurate, realistic representation of task performance especially where more than one video is used; a permanent record of the observed behaviour.
The disadvantages include: vast amounts of data that are difficult to analyse effectively; transcription; obtrusiveness; special equipment required.
By carrying out this exercise, you will experience some of the difficulties of representing a visual record in a semi-formal written format. If you are working in a group, discuss which parts of the video are most difficult to represent, and how important these parts are to understanding the clip.
In Section 9.4.2 (An example: evaluating icon designs), we saw that the observed results could be the result of interference. Can you think of alternative designs that may make this less likely? Remember that individual variation was very high, so you must retain a within-subjects design, but you may perform more tests on each participant.
Three possible ways of reducing interference are:
Notice that all the above measures require additional subject time and one has to constantly weigh up the advantages of richer experiments against those of larger subject groups.
Choose an appropriate evaluation method for each of the following situations. In each case identify
(i) The participants.
(ii) The technique used.
(iii) Representative tasks to be examined.
(iv) Measurements that would be appropriate.
(v) An outline plan for carrying out the evaluation.
(a) You are at an early stage in the
design of a spreadsheet package and you wish to test
what type of icons will be easiest to learn.
(b) You have a prototype for a theatre booking system to be used by potential theatre-goers to reduce queues at the box office.
(c) You have designed and implemented a new game system and want to evaluate it before release.
(d) You have developed a group decision support system for a solicitor's office.
(e) You have been asked to develop a system to store and manage student exam results and would like to test two different designs prior to implementation or prototyping.
Note that these answers are illustrative; there are many possible evaluation techniques that could be appropriate to the scenarios described.
|(i) Subjects||Typical users: secretaries, academics, students, accountants, home users, schoolchildren|
|(ii) Technique||Heuristic evaluation|
|(iii) Representative tasks||Sorting data, printing spreadsheet, formatting cells, adding functions, producing graphs|
|(iv) Measurements||Speed of recognition, accuracy of recognition, user-perceived clarity|
|(v) Outline plan||Test the subjects with examples of each icon in various styles, noting responses.|
Theatre booking system
|(i) Subjects||Theatre-goers, the general public|
|(ii) Technique||Think aloud|
|(iii) Representative tasks||Finding next available tickets for a show, selecting seats, changing seats, changing date of booking|
|(iv) Measurements||Qualitative measures of users' comfort with system, measures of cognitive complexity, quantitative measures of time taken to perform task, errors made|
|(v) Outline plan||Present users with prototype system and tasks, record their observations whilst carrying out the tasks and refine results into categories identified in (iv).|
New game system
|(i) Subjects||The game's target audience: age, sex, typical profile should be determined for the game in advance and the test users should be selected from this population, plus a few from outside to see if it has wider appeal|
|(ii) Technique||Think aloud|
|(iii) Representative tasks||Whatever gameplay tasks there are - character movement, problem solving, etc.|
|(iv) Measurements||Speed of response, scores achieved, extent of game mastered.|
|(v) Outline plan||Allow subjects to play game and talk as they do so. Collect qualitative and quantitative evidence, follow up with questionnaire to assess satisfaction with gaming experience, etc.|
Group decision support system
|(i) Subjects||Solicitors, legal assistants, possibly clients|
|(ii) Technique||Cognitive walkthrough|
|(iii) Representative tasks||Anything requiring shared decision making: compensation claims, plea bargaining, complex issues with a diverse range of expertise needed.|
|(iv) Measurements||Accuracy of information presented and accessible, veracity of audit trail of discussion, screen clutter and confusion, confusion owing to turn-taking protocols|
|(v) Outline plan||Evaluate by having experts walk through the system performing tasks, commenting as necessary.|
Exam result management
|(i) Subjects||Exams officer, secretaries, academics|
|(ii) Technique||Think aloud, questionnaires|
|(iii) Representative tasks||Storing marks, altering marks, deleting marks, collating information, security protection|
|(iv) Measurements||Ease of use, levels of security and error correction provided, accuracy of user|
|(v) Outline plan||Users perform tasks set, with running verbal commentary on immediate thoughts and considered views gained by questionnaire at end.|
9.4 Complete the cognitive walkthrough example for the video remote control design.
Continue to ask the four questions for each Action in the sequence. Work out what the user will do and how the sytem will respond. If you can analyse B and C, you will find that Actions D to I are similar.
Hint: Remember that there is no universal format for dates.
Action J: Think about the first question. Will the user even know they need to press the transmit button? Isn't it likely that the user will reach closure after Action I?
9.5 In defining an experimental study,
(a) how you as an experimenter would formulate the hypothesis to be supported or refuted by your study
(b) how you would decide between a within-groups or between-groups experimental design with your subjects
answer available for tutors only
9.6 What are the factors governing the choice of an appropriate evaluation method for different interactive systems? Give brief details.
answer available for tutors only
ex.9.1 (ans), ex.9.2 (ans), ex.9.3 (ans), ex.9.4 (ans), ex.9.5 (ans), ex.9.6 (tut), ex.9.7 (tut)
Worked exercises in book
Design an experiment to test whether adding colour coding to an interface will improve accuracy. [page 339]
You have been asked to compare user performance and preferences with two different learning systems, one using hypermedia (see Chapter 21), the other sequential lessons. Design a questionnaire to find out what the users think of the system. How would you go about comparing user performance with these two systems? [page 351]